Intramedullary nailing of multiple long-bone fractures of the lower extremity at the same surgery: a single-center experience.

We evaluated the outcome of multiple intramedullary nailing at the same surgery for traumatic long-bone fractures. All but 2 of 27 patients (average age 40) had been involved in motor vehicle accidents, and 17 of them presented with other associated nonorthopedic injuries. Ten patients had open fractures. Sixty-one nails were used. The average time from accident to fixation was 8.16 h, and the average time in the operating room was 5.4 h. No patients died; all required blood transfusion; and eight patients were admitted for at least 24 h to the intensive care unit. The average hospital stay was 27 days, the mean time to full weight-bearing was 4 months, and the average time to radiographic healing was 7.5 months. Three patients required dynamization to achieve fracture union; three underwent exchange nailing for nonunion and one for nail breakage. Thus, early fixation of multiple long-bone fractures by intramedullary nailing in polytrauma patients is an acceptable treatment method.

Femoral exchange nailing for aseptic non-union: not the end to all problems.

We report the results of a single centre prospective study of exchange nailing for aseptic non-union of a femoral fracture. Eighteen patients with 19 aseptic femoral non-unions had exchange nailing performed in our institution. We collected data on mechanism of injury, original fracture type, and indication for exchange nailing, further surgery and major complications. In 11 non-unions (58%), the exchange nail procedure alone resulted in fracture union with a mean time to radiographic union of 9 months (range 3-24 months). The non-union did not heal in five patients, two patients developed an infected non-union, and one patient required dynamisation of the exchange nail. Fracture healing was eventually achieved in 18 non-unions (95%). Complications following exchange nailing occurred in 11 fractures (58%), in which further surgery was required (four repeat exchange nailings, two Ilizarov frame applications and five nail removals). The role of reamed exchange nailing in the treatment of femoral non-union needs to be re-evaluated. Although fracture healing is eventually achieved in most patients, a significant number of them required additional surgery to achieve union or to deal with complications arising from the exchange nailing.

The role of caudal epidural injections in the management of low back pain.

The value of caudal epidural steroid injections (CEI) in treatment of low back pain and sciatica is controversial. It is believed that CEI are mainly effective in treating acute radiculopathy at intermediate term follow up and have no long-term benefit. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of CEI in the management of low back pain. This study reviews all patients with low back pain and sciatica treated with CEI in a one-year period (1997) in the orthopaedic department at Aberdeen. The case notes of 163 out of a possible 175 patients (87 female 76 male) with mean age of 51 years (range: 17 to 88 years) were reviewed. Data collected included primary symptoms, presentation time, presumed diagnosis, MRI diagnosis, grade of the surgeon ordering and performing the procedure, the quality and duration of response, and final outcome. Patients were regarded as having an Excellent response if they had good or excellent pain relief for more than 3 months, a Good response (6 weeks to 3 months), Fair (4 to 6 weeks), Brief (any pain relief for less than 4 weeks), and No relief. Forty-one percent of patients had either an excellent/good response to CEI while 34% were no better or worse. Patients presenting acutely or with predominantly leg pain symptoms did not respond any better to the CEI than chronic presentations or low back pain alone. Only 36 of 73 patients who were discharged had an Excellent/Good response. Therefore the response to CEI did not influence the decision to discharge half of the patients. The experience of the surgeon performing the procedure did not make a difference in the outcome. We found that the outcome of CEI was unpredictable. The clinical value of CEI remains unproven. The decision to perform the procedure may well remain a matter of personal choice and experience.

Fractures in children younger than age 1 year: importance of collaboration with child protection services.

The medical records of all children less than 1 year of age presenting to the Accident and Emergency Department over a 5-year period (1995-1999) with a fracture were retrospectively reviewed for possible abuse. Seventy-four children presented with fractures during the study period, with a mean age at presentation of 5 months (range 2 weeks to 1 year). Of these children, 46 had skull fractures and 28 had long bone fractures. Children were classified into one of seven categories: definite abuse, likely abuse, suspicious, likely accident, definite accident, neglect, or unknown cause. A three-tier system of grading for possible abuse was then used to analyze variance. The first tier consisted of the initial assessment by staff clinicians, the second retrospectively by an orthopaedic registrar, and the third retrospectively by a designated doctor in child protection (consultant pediatrician), all using the same information from the case notes. The use of the three-tier system of grading demonstrated a variance in the diagnosis of nonaccidental injury. The possibility of abuse was underestimated at the time of the original injury in over a quarter of cases (28.4%) when compared with the assessment by the consultant pediatrician. In 34 children (46%), there was no written documentation that nonaccidental injury was ever considered. While management depends on local guidelines and arrangements, the authors would advise that all children under 1 year of age with a fracture should be admitted to the hospital and referred to a pediatrician for child protection assessment.